<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?><rss version="2.0"
	xmlns:content="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/content/"
	xmlns:dc="http://purl.org/dc/elements/1.1/"
	xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom"
	>
<channel>
	<title>Comments on: Street&#8217;s Disciple</title>
	<atom:link href="http://therapup.uproxx.com/2007/11/streets-disciple.html/feed" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml" />
	<link>http://therapup.uproxx.com/2007/11/streets-disciple.html</link>
	<description>Hip-Hop on the Highest Level</description>
	<pubDate>Thu,  4 Dec 2008 04:18:36 +0000</pubDate>
	<generator>http://wordpress.org/?v=2.6.3</generator>
		<item>
		<title>By: J to the AAP</title>
		<link>http://therapup.uproxx.com/2007/11/streets-disciple.html#comment-13975</link>
		<dc:creator>J to the AAP</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Mon, 03 Dec 2007 09:22:43 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://therapup.rawkus.com/2007/11/streets-disciple.html#comment-13975</guid>
		<description>Mmm... i rate Speakerboxx/Love Below as Outkast's weakest moment (maybe next to Idelwild). Big Boi's half was nice, Dre's half was interesting but with little replay value, overall pretty good, but not by 'Kast standards. Big Boi+Andre &#62; Big Boi &lt;i&gt;or&lt;/i&gt; Andre imo.

SD is mad underrated, but better than LAD or WTF? Not in my book. And Chaz raises a valid point, UGK definitley deserves a spot in the double album top 5.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Mmm&#8230; i rate Speakerboxx/Love Below as Outkast&#8217;s weakest moment (maybe next to Idelwild). Big Boi&#8217;s half was nice, Dre&#8217;s half was interesting but with little replay value, overall pretty good, but not by &#8216;Kast standards. Big Boi+Andre &gt; Big Boi <i>or</i> Andre imo.</p>
<p>SD is mad underrated, but better than LAD or WTF? Not in my book. And Chaz raises a valid point, UGK definitley deserves a spot in the double album top 5.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Understanding</title>
		<link>http://therapup.uproxx.com/2007/11/streets-disciple.html#comment-13969</link>
		<dc:creator>Understanding</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Mon, 03 Dec 2007 05:49:37 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://therapup.rawkus.com/2007/11/streets-disciple.html#comment-13969</guid>
		<description>Good look. That Street's Disciple joint has been one of my favorite CD's since it came out.  "Remember The Times", "Theif's Theme", "American Way", "These Are Our Heroes", "Live Now", "Reason" ...

Mad joints on this CD set. The fact that NaS's lazy ass* only did two video's 4 it kinda' pisses me off but its always two or three with dude.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Good look. That Street&#8217;s Disciple joint has been one of my favorite CD&#8217;s since it came out.  &#8220;Remember The Times&#8221;, &#8220;Theif&#8217;s Theme&#8221;, &#8220;American Way&#8221;, &#8220;These Are Our Heroes&#8221;, &#8220;Live Now&#8221;, &#8220;Reason&#8221; &#8230;</p>
<p>Mad joints on this CD set. The fact that NaS&#8217;s lazy ass* only did two video&#8217;s 4 it kinda&#8217; pisses me off but its always two or three with dude.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Chaz</title>
		<link>http://therapup.uproxx.com/2007/11/streets-disciple.html#comment-13917</link>
		<dc:creator>Chaz</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Sun, 02 Dec 2007 02:30:01 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://therapup.rawkus.com/2007/11/streets-disciple.html#comment-13917</guid>
		<description>Where would the new UGK fit in? That's a great ass double album.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Where would the new UGK fit in? That&#8217;s a great ass double album.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: T2</title>
		<link>http://therapup.uproxx.com/2007/11/streets-disciple.html#comment-13896</link>
		<dc:creator>T2</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Sat, 01 Dec 2007 20:06:48 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://therapup.rawkus.com/2007/11/streets-disciple.html#comment-13896</guid>
		<description>BP 2 had great tracks but it had way to much fillers to be called a classic same with  Streets Disciples.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>BP 2 had great tracks but it had way to much fillers to be called a classic same with  Streets Disciples.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Erock LAzron</title>
		<link>http://therapup.uproxx.com/2007/11/streets-disciple.html#comment-13888</link>
		<dc:creator>Erock LAzron</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Sat, 01 Dec 2007 17:22:46 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://therapup.rawkus.com/2007/11/streets-disciple.html#comment-13888</guid>
		<description>1) Wu Tang Forever
2) Speakerboxx
3) Street's Disciple
4) All Eyez on Me
5) Life After Death

Consistancy wise, thats the order I'd put em' in, but it's sacrilege to not even have Wu Tang Forever in your top 3</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>1) Wu Tang Forever<br />
2) Speakerboxx<br />
3) Street&#8217;s Disciple<br />
4) All Eyez on Me<br />
5) Life After Death</p>
<p>Consistancy wise, thats the order I&#8217;d put em&#8217; in, but it&#8217;s sacrilege to not even have Wu Tang Forever in your top 3</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: ICE</title>
		<link>http://therapup.uproxx.com/2007/11/streets-disciple.html#comment-13884</link>
		<dc:creator>ICE</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Sat, 01 Dec 2007 15:22:48 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://therapup.rawkus.com/2007/11/streets-disciple.html#comment-13884</guid>
		<description>With 3 singles like that how can it not be considered one of the best dbl albums?!

HTTP://ICEDOTCOM.BLOGSPOT.COM/</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>With 3 singles like that how can it not be considered one of the best dbl albums?!</p>
<p>HTTP://ICEDOTCOM.BLOGSPOT.COM/</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Fivefold</title>
		<link>http://therapup.uproxx.com/2007/11/streets-disciple.html#comment-13877</link>
		<dc:creator>Fivefold</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Sat, 01 Dec 2007 11:22:16 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://therapup.rawkus.com/2007/11/streets-disciple.html#comment-13877</guid>
		<description>How about "Blueprint 2"? It should be up there!!!

lol</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>How about &#8220;Blueprint 2&#8243;? It should be up there!!!</p>
<p>lol</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: esbee</title>
		<link>http://therapup.uproxx.com/2007/11/streets-disciple.html#comment-13870</link>
		<dc:creator>esbee</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Sat, 01 Dec 2007 09:12:25 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://therapup.rawkus.com/2007/11/streets-disciple.html#comment-13870</guid>
		<description>Has any double album really been good though?

Even Jay knew BP2 had its bout with filler hence BP 2.1

It's really difficult to do a double album and have it be perfect. I think Wu-tang forever leads the pack...and let's not get it twisted AOOM had its filler moments..</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Has any double album really been good though?</p>
<p>Even Jay knew BP2 had its bout with filler hence BP 2.1</p>
<p>It&#8217;s really difficult to do a double album and have it be perfect. I think Wu-tang forever leads the pack&#8230;and let&#8217;s not get it twisted AOOM had its filler moments..</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Llano</title>
		<link>http://therapup.uproxx.com/2007/11/streets-disciple.html#comment-13862</link>
		<dc:creator>Llano</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Sat, 01 Dec 2007 04:16:09 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://therapup.rawkus.com/2007/11/streets-disciple.html#comment-13862</guid>
		<description>That bridging the gap remix goes to show you how a dope beat could of helped many of nas' songs. You know his flow is always up to par but sometimes I question his beat selection.... He's still the GOAT though.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>That bridging the gap remix goes to show you how a dope beat could of helped many of nas&#8217; songs. You know his flow is always up to par but sometimes I question his beat selection&#8230;. He&#8217;s still the GOAT though.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Rizoh</title>
		<link>http://therapup.uproxx.com/2007/11/streets-disciple.html#comment-13859</link>
		<dc:creator>Rizoh</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Sat, 01 Dec 2007 03:07:30 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://therapup.rawkus.com/2007/11/streets-disciple.html#comment-13859</guid>
		<description>Again...

#  Rizoh Says:
November 30th, 2007 at 5:55 pm e

LAD would tie SD for the No.3 slot and Wu-Tang Forever would definitely make my top 5.

I’m still waiting on some random Jay-Z fan to come here and say some outlandish sh*t about Blueprint 2.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Again&#8230;</p>
<p>#  Rizoh Says:<br />
November 30th, 2007 at 5:55 pm e</p>
<p>LAD would tie SD for the No.3 slot and Wu-Tang Forever would definitely make my top 5.</p>
<p>I’m still waiting on some random Jay-Z fan to come here and say some outlandish sh*t about Blueprint 2.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
</channel>
</rss>
